Wireless Broadband Operator Raines has come to the rescue of Ikea on a temporary spectrum with Telkom in the legal exhibition of communications regulators.
TechCentral learned that Rainy filed a paper in the High Court this week warning that Telecom is trying to license Spectrum from the back door and saying that if the company succeeds in preventing Icasa, There can be permanent damage compared. The telecommunications industry – and, with the extension Erie, to consumers.
Rain wants the court to reject Telecom’s request that Icasa be stopped for a speedy intervention as it plans to return to the temporary spectrum at the end of November.
In an affidavit submitted to the court, seen by TechCentral, Rain’s chief technology officer Gustav Schumann said: “In April 2020, Telecom received a large amount of spectrum from Icasa – but under one. Temporary The Spectrum Government aims to end the network’s rush during unstable and uncertain times when the Quotient 19 epidemic began and every South African was confined to his home during a severe lockdown.
After those months and months, conditions are “very different,” Schumann said. “The sanctions have been softened, South Africa is constantly vaccinated, and there is very little chance that South Africa will return to the tough lockdown of April 2020.
That is why it is perfectly legitimate for Icasa to want to change the temporary government that it established last year. Neither conditions have changed, but ops report that competition in the Spectrum Assignment market is causing permanent damage.
“Telkom is not trying to protect the ‘stability of the ICT industry’. It is trying to protect the most unfair spectrum assignment that it has received under the Emergency Government. There is no reasonable claim that Nodo Market Share will use the temporary spectrum and establish its dominance in the industry using Vodacam and MTN. Their Transient Spectrum, all for long-term loss of users.
With TechCentral over the weekend, however, Rainy CEO Brandon Lee said that if Telkom succeeded in preventing an interruption, the damage could be permanent.
Rain’s legal team is fighting legal not only with Tel-Tel and Tel-Com, but also Vodacam and MTN, who filed a petition in the High Court this week in favor of a telecom petition against Icasa. MTN also filed separate separate papers, giving additional evidence against the return of these temporary spectrum assignments.
We feel strongly that operators, and Telkom in particular, are misusing this process for spectrum allocation.
But Lee told TechCentral I was awarded the Icasa Temporary Spectrum on an emergency basis in 2020, soon after the KOID-19 hit, and that does not mean it is licensed on a long-term basis.
“In good faith, Icasa allocates all the resources they can to handle (for network traffic to people working at home),” he said. “It was temporary – it’s even in the name.
Rain, Levy said, is concerned that if the temporary spectrum is not returned, then it will become “another fixation allocation” from a formal licensing process. There is hope. For the Rand of National Fax – and the market will be inc in favor of the discretionary operators.
Lee also attacked Telecom for holding the auction through legal proceedings – the company withdrew a lawsuit against Icasa in March, forcing it to withdraw an invitation to apply for an auction. He argued that the reason for the telecom’s lack of access to the spectrum is still used by television broadcasters (an important component of their prosecution against the licensing process) – otherwise it was fighting temporary assignments. To put it in. Those groups
“Telkom argues that it cannot use 700MHz and 800MHz … yet, in this application, it has asked to be kept. How can you argue that you want to close the auction because you say you can’t use (700MHz and 800MHz bands) but also want to have a temporary spectrum (in those bands)?
“We feel strongly that operators, and especially telecom, are misusing this process for spectrum allocation. Telkom always stops the auction from anyone who has spectrum spectrum, and they say they want this spectrum. They have a spectrum they already use. Why do they need more tweaks?
Lee said that Woodcom, MTN and Telecom acquired large portions of the spectrum from Icasa under Quo-19 rules. ين The yen market players, including the rain, did not request much spectrum – if at all – it was always a short-term solution to deal with the national crisis. (Icasa has recently pointed out that the cell did not demand access to any temporary spectrum, using it temporarily to justify not doing so.)
“If we had not known that the temporary spectrum allocation would last for two years, we would have applied for everything we could get,” Lee said.
“We need a tough competition environment. We do not need to misuse the faith given to everyone (by Icasa). We agree that the auction should be … what is not right is creating a concept of fear as an incentive in deciding to intimidate the courts to change the approval of the telecom in South Africa forever. Will….
‘We will fight’
“Telecom aims to create a fear of ‘digital loading’ using temporary spectrum, and to justify allocating spectrum to use it. We will fight it…
He said: “The perpetual spectrum creates a disappointment for the perpetual license holders as they support the auction of the spectrum; Will need to do. “
One solution, Levy said, could be to arrange a transient spectrum so that the temporary spectrum be replaced until it can be auctioned. But he warned that this would essentially be a new licensing process with “a very different intent to allocate a quad emergency.”
The High Court is expected to hear the case on October 26 on an emergency basis. – (c) 2021 NewsCentral Media